《现代中国的述学文体》
定价：88.00元
作者：陈平原  著
丛书名：陈平原著作系列
书号：978-7-301-31366-4
装帧：精装              
出版日期：2020/08       
出版社：北京大学出版社
开本：16                
页码：404

内容简介

本书是陈平原“学术史研究三部曲”之一。晚清以降，著作体例与述学文体的巨大变更，使得现代中国的人文学者步履艰难。从当初的“拿来主义”，到今日的“与世界接轨”，在20世纪中国学界，占主导地位的声音是以“科学”取代“夸饰”。著述的不严谨乃至抄袭成风，确实是中国学界的痼疾，可这并不能掩盖问题的另一面，即人文学本身带有很强的修辞意味。谈论人文学的修辞学，不妨先从述学文体说起，因这既牵涉到学术训练、表达能力，更根源于文化心态。不管是赓续传统，还是译述西学，如何弥合自身文体与论述对象之间的缝隙，都是一个必须直面的难题。本书谈论现代中国的述学文体，主要是谈在中外新旧文化激烈碰撞的时代，中国学者如何建立“表达”的立场、方式与边界。

作者简介

陈平原，北京大学博雅讲席教授，教育部长江学者，著有《中国现代学术之建立》《现代中国的述学文体》《触摸历史与进入五四》《千古文人侠客梦》《读书的风景》等著作多部。


目录

前　言················································································1

第一章　现代中国的述学文体

——以“引经据典”为中心 ·····································13

一　作为述学文体表征的“引语” ···································13

二　明引与暗引 ···························································17

三　正引与反引 ···························································24

四　全引与略引 ···························································29

第二章　有声的中国

——演说与近现代中国文章变革 ·······························35

一　演说之于“开启民智” ············································38

二　演说的诸面相 ························································49

三　演说与学堂之关系 ··················································57

四 “学艺”还是“事业” ·············································65

五　文章体式的革新 ·····················································76

六　以“演说”为“著述” ············································85

第三章　学术讲演与白话文学

——1922年的“风景” ··········································95

一　四座城市与四位学者（上） ······································98

二　四座城市与四位学者（下） ····································· 105

三　讲演者的风采 ······················································· 111

四 “白话”如何“文学” ············································ 122

五　以“讲演”为“文章” ··········································· 136

第四章　何为“大学”以及如何“大学”

——蔡元培的学术立场及文体意识 ··························· 144

一　大学史及“蔡元培神话” ········································ 145

二 “博大”而非“精深”的教育家 ································ 151

三 “大学”面面观 ····················································· 160

四　作为演说家的蔡元培 ·············································· 173

五 “演说”是如何成为“文章”的 ································ 178

六　大学是做出来的，也是讲出来的 ······························· 185

第五章　兼及“著作”与“文章”

——关于章太炎的《国故论衡》 ······························ 189

一　学术史家的自我定位 ·············································· 190

二 “精心结构”的“著作” ········································· 194

三　在“管籥”与“堂奥”之间 ····································· 199

四 “文实闳雅”的著述 ··············································· 203

第六章　“元气淋漓”与“绝大文字”

——梁启超及“史界革命”的另一面 ························ 209

一 “史界革命”与“文界革命” ··································· 210

二　政论文章与历史著述 ·············································· 216

三 “极宜着意修饰”的“论学文字” ····························· 226

四　史家的“文人习气” ·············································· 232

第七章　分裂的趣味与抵抗的立场

——鲁迅的述学文体及其接受 ·································242

一　文体家的别择 ·······················································242

二　论著、杂文与演讲 ·················································250

三　古书与口语的纠葛 ·················································258

四　直译的主张与以文言述学 ········································263

五　文体的“抵抗” ····················································274

第八章　“精心结构”与“明白清楚”

——胡适述学文体研究 ··········································282

一 “论学”与“述学” ···············································284

二　述学文体之选择 ····················································293

三　文章结构与名学根基 ··············································304

四　演讲兴趣与文章功底 ··············································313

附录一　关于现代中国的“述学文体” ···································322

附录二　如何“述学”，什么“文体” ····································334

引用及参考书目 ·································································346

人名索引 ··········································································358

书名、篇名索引 ·································································369

后　记 ·············································································394

文摘

前　言
与唐宋诗文或上古史研究不同，“现代中国研究”往往与当下的思想文化潮流乃至政治局势相互激荡，好处是问题意识突出，缺陷则是容易陷入古今循环论证。当初选择这个题目，确实别有幽怀，日后在推进过程中，腾挪趋避，更是得失寸心知。如今到了收官阶段，正准备撰写序言，收拾无比杂乱的书房时，竟然发现好几篇早年文章手稿，其中有两则让我感慨万端。

初刊《东方》创刊号（1993年10月）、后收入《当代中国人文观察》（北京：人民文学出版社，2004年；增订本，北京：北京大学出版社，2010年）的《当代中国人文学者的命运及其选择》，其中这段话，已经过去四分之一世纪了，至今重读，仍让我热血沸腾：