《中国—新加坡“一带一路”国际商事审判案例选》系由中华人民共和国最高人民法院与新加坡共和国最高法院合作主编，所选案例均为两方最高法院审结的、具有社会影响力的商事案例。本书序言分别由两国最高司法审判机关首席大法官撰写，裁判要旨的撰写者为法官，专家点评人均为两国在商事法律领域具有知名度的学者。针对每篇商事案例的中文内容，其后有相应的英文译文作为参照。本书包括“中国案例”和“新加坡案例”两部分。

中国案例

交通运输部南海救助局诉阿昌格罗斯投资公司、香港安达欧森有限公司上海代表处海难救助合同纠纷案

　——雇佣救助合同依据合同法的相关规定确定当事人的权利义务

　　　Nanhai Rescue Bureau of the Ministry of Transport v. Archangelos Investments E.N.E. and Shanghai Representative Office of Hong Kong Andaousen Co, Ltd for the Dispute over a Contract for Salvage at Sea

　—To Determine the Rights and Obligations of the Parties to an Employment Contract for Salvage in Accordance with Relevant Provisions of the Contract Law

申请人运裕有限公司诉被申请人深圳市中苑城商业投资控股有限公司申请确认仲裁协议效力案

　——仲裁条款可以独立于合同而成立

　　　Luck Treat Limited v. Shenzhen Zhongyuan City Commercial Investment Holding Co, Ltd for Application of Confirmation on the Validity of an Arbitration Agreement

　—Arbitration Clauses Can Have Effect Independent of the 

Contract

高尔集团股份有限公司申请承认和执行新加坡高等法庭民事判决案

　——互惠原则在外国法院判决审查案件中的适用

　　　Application of Kolmar Group AG for Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Judgment of Singapore High Court

　—Application of the Principle of Reciprocity to Reviewing Cases Decided by Foreign Courts

xxxxxxi浙江隆达不锈钢有限公司诉AP穆勒-马士基有限公司海上货物运输合同纠纷案

　——托运人变更运输合同的权利及合理规制

　　　Zhejiang Longda Stainless Steel Co, Ltd v. A.P. MollerMaersk A/S for the Dispute over a Contract for Carriage of Goods by Sea

　—A Shippers Right to Change or Modify Transport Contracts and Reasonable Institutions

中化国际（新加坡）有限公司诉蒂森克虏伯冶金产品有限责任公司国际货物买卖合同纠纷案

　——《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》的适用及根本违约的认定

　　Sinochem International (Singapore) Pte Ltd v. ThyssenKrupp Metallurgical Products GmbH for the Dispute over a Contract for the International Sale of Goods

　—Application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and Determination of Fundamental Breach of Contract

新加坡案例

JIO Minerals FZC and others v. Mineral Enterprises Ltd

——用以确定哪个国家为申索的自然行诉地时所适用的普通法原则（与法院不方便审理有关）

　　JIO Minerals FZC and others v. Mineral Enterprises Ltd

—Common Law Principles (Relating to Forum Non Conveniens) for Determining Which Country is the Natural Forum for the Claims in Question BNA v. BNB and another

——仲裁协议准据法的确定以及在确定是否执行各方的仲裁意图时应对仲裁协议作出适当解释

　　BNA v. BNB and another

—The Determination of the Proper Law of an Arbitration Agreement, 

and the Proper Construction to be Given to an Arbitration Agreement in Determining Whether the Parties Intention to Arbitrate Should be Enforced

捷安特轻合金科技（昆山）有限公司 v. 雅柯斯（远东）私人有限公司

——有关承认与执行外国判决的普通法规则以及新加坡法院承认与执行符合相关规定的中国法院判决

　　Giant Light Metal Technology （Kunshan） Co Ltd v. Aksa Far East Pte Ltd

—Common Law Rules on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, and that a Singapore Court Will Recognise and Enforce Judgments of a Chinese Court If the Relevant Requirements are Satisfied

Quoine Pte Ltd v. B2C2 Ltd

——计算机交易系统生成的合同如何适用传统合同法原则

xxxii　　Quoine Pte Ltd v. B2C2 Ltd

—The Applicability of Traditional Contract Law Principles to Contracts Made by Computerised Trading Systems